|
|
Post by aljhunter on Nov 13, 2007 10:17:02 GMT -5
I am curious. Assuming that they care, have the powers-that-be in AALJ expressed any reaction to the range of scores reported on this board?
|
|
|
|
Post by johnthornton on Nov 13, 2007 10:20:10 GMT -5
I am curious. Assuming that they care, have the powers-that-be in AALJ expressed any reaction to the range of scores reported on this board? Not that I have heard. The union continues to spend copious amounts of Union dues to fight OPM based on its "information and belief" that the process was rigged in favor of SSA attorneys. |
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Nov 13, 2007 20:20:00 GMT -5
The scores are the furtherest things from the minds of the AALJ leadership, or the vast majority of the regular judges, for that matter. It really is of no concern to them. Pix.
|
|
|
|
Post by kingfisher on Nov 13, 2007 20:57:03 GMT -5
There are some ALJs aware of and concerned about the scoring, as well as the entire process. I am one of them. First, I am grateful that I wasn't treated that way, as such a scoring system would have been very damaging to my ego. Second, I have watched people I care about being hurt by the scoring process. Third, I have watched someone close to me being knocked out of the application process for not listing the month the 24 years of relevant experience began and the month it ended. You know, the prior process under which I became an ALJ had its problems, but not like this. However, if you can hang in there ~ and it is definitely not easy ~ I had to wait on the list for 8 years so I know ~ it will be well worth it to have a chance at to be an ALJ. It is an excellent job and I really enjoy it.  |
|
