|
Post by Pixie on Nov 20, 2007 20:07:41 GMT -5
The certificate should have included only those who specified at least one city where there is an opening. That is the normal way certificates are sent over.
This whole discussion about someone receiving a call for an interview in a city she did not list is most confusing to me. Absent an error, it shouldn't work that way. Pix.
|
|
|
Post by counselor95 on Nov 20, 2007 20:31:28 GMT -5
I don't remember an option to merely check "all" cities -- I had to check every block (for every city I chose). So, it should not matter how many cities were checked -- anyone who said he/she was available for a particular city should have been on the certificate, assuming his/her score was in the top 3. Or at least that is what I thought . . .
|
|
|
Post by advancedage on Nov 20, 2007 20:32:28 GMT -5
And, advancedage, are you going to interview? Or, did OMHA say something like "Call in the next 10 minutes or the offer for the interview expires." aljhunter, a colleague fielded the call for me and scheduled the interview for next week, via telephone. I don't wish to deflate hopes, but I was advised that all the interviews had been scheduled. No other info or rumors re: OMHA, However, I heard from a reliable agency source-- who should know -- that SSA has not yet started interviews -- the posts on the other board notwithstanding.
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Nov 20, 2007 21:56:51 GMT -5
I don't remember an option to merely check "all" cities -- I had to check every block (for every city I chose). So, it should not matter how many cities were checked -- anyone who said he/she was available for a particular city should have been on the certificate, assuming his/her score was in the top 3. Or at least that is what I thought . . . And you thought right. That's the way it should work. Pix.
|
|
|
Post by kingfisher on Nov 20, 2007 22:03:59 GMT -5
I also heard that SSA has not yet scheduled interviews and will not until the budget situation is resolved. That is correct. No budget, no authorization for additional hiring. The legislature is on break until Dec 4th so there will be no further consideration of the appropriations until then. If you want to monitor for yourself, go to www.congress.gov
|
|
calalj
Full Member
Who shall know when the masts and sails of rescue may emerge from the fog? -Justice Benjamin Cardozo
Posts: 41
|
Post by calalj on Nov 21, 2007 1:03:50 GMT -5
I think Judge Liberty is coming from HUD and will be in Cleveland within the month. It's true. He is a friend of mine. We teach a fair housing litigation skills course every year at a law school in Chicago. He is a good guy.
|
|
|
Post by odarite on Nov 21, 2007 7:37:55 GMT -5
|
|
lee
Full Member
Posts: 102
|
Post by lee on Nov 21, 2007 13:10:33 GMT -5
I just heard from a friend with Medicare that they have lost several judges to SSA during the past year. Due to these departures, and the fact that they have the budget to do so, they are going forward with interviews now. He indicated that the Miami office is down from 17 ALJs to 12. Good luck to those of you who will be interviewing soon. Happy Thanksgiving.
|
|
|
Post by watchfulwaiting on Nov 21, 2007 13:56:39 GMT -5
I just got a call about 10 minutes ago from OMHA in Cleveland to interview by phone next week for Irvine or Miami.
|
|
|
Post by emphyrio on Nov 21, 2007 14:59:10 GMT -5
I hate to say this, but is it possible that the certificate only included those who specified at least one city where there was an opening? If that is true, it is totally unfair (even though I would benefit from such a rule). I'm so sorry. The process by which OMHA is scheduling interviews is a total mystery, but the fact that it is scheduling interviews at all is a pleasant surprise. This is good news for everyone. So I say good luck, and I see no reason to apologize. The more openings there are, the higher the chances that anyone on the register gets an offer. If the highest people on the register get hired by OMHA, then when ODAR starts interviews it will have to dig even deeper into the register than it would have otherwise.
|
|
|
Post by jagghagg on Nov 22, 2007 8:17:32 GMT -5
I also heard that SSA has not yet scheduled interviews and will not until the budget situation is resolved. For what it is worth: my SSA source tells me March.
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Nov 22, 2007 18:49:21 GMT -5
At this point no one really knows because the budget is still unresolved. Once the budget passes, things will move quickly (quickly for the government). If SSA gets a budget the first week of December, there may still be time to get the interviews started the end January. That would mean the March 17 start date for the new class would still be viable.
Although, based on the way things look now, I would say that the March class will be more like an April or May class. We will have to wait and see how the budget shakes out. Pix.
|
|
|
Post by workdrone on Nov 26, 2007 22:26:36 GMT -5
Glad to hear it's resolved in your favor and good luck to you! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Nov 26, 2007 22:34:53 GMT -5
Thank goodness it was human error. That's what I suspected all along. Just wasn't right the way things were unfolding. So, back to business as we all understand it. Pix.
|
|
|
Post by jagghagg on Nov 27, 2007 5:20:37 GMT -5
I am having that interview tomorrow morning. Wow - a resolution appropriate to the error - congrats, JustFound !! That is great and I am happy to hear it is working out for you!
|
|
|
Post by watchfulwaiting on Nov 27, 2007 8:26:37 GMT -5
Justfoundthisboard, that's fantastic! Good luck on your interview.
|
|
|
Post by tricia on Nov 27, 2007 10:24:39 GMT -5
Congratulations Justfound. I guess your interview is this morning. Hope you let us know about it.
|
|
|
Post by okeydokey on Nov 27, 2007 13:03:50 GMT -5
Rumor (which I consider reliable) has it that OMHA scheduled 36 interviews for Irvine and Miami (combined) and that the lowest score on the list was slightly under 76.
|
|
podar
Full Member
Posts: 39
|
Post by podar on Nov 27, 2007 19:57:23 GMT -5
Hi everyone. I hesitate to involve math in live posting because I'll probably make an error -- but I'll try it anyway.
Listed availability is the big confounding variable that would prevent useful extrapolation. We know 4 people of 41 scores above 76 listed on this board (on-board scorers) were invited to interview. Each of the 4 listed availability for at least one of three cities on the certificate(s): Miami, Irvine, and Cleveland. Because Watchfulwaiting eventually got his call, we know of no one on this board who did not get a call from OMHA among those who claim a score of 76.71 or above and listed availability for any of these cities. We do not have a good sampling regarding the range of availability listed by the other higher scorers on this board or all scorers on-board for that matter. Even if we did have availability lists for all higher scores on this board, we still don’t know how that would compare with availability lists submitted by the other three quarters of the register (off-board scorers). Assuming everyone with a score listed on-board has faithfully reported contacts with OMHA (and ignoring the big confounding variables discussed above), we can make comparisons between the number of on-board and off-board scorers invited to interview. We can calculate the percentage of on-board higher scorers (76 or above for this comparison) invited and the percentage of the total on-board scorers invited. The four on-board invitees probably represent 12.5 percent of those invited to interview (an eighth or 4/32). They represent about 10 percent of our reported higher scorers (4 of 41), but only 2.56 percent of all scores reported on-board (4 of 156). The 28 other people invited probably represent about 6.2 percent of the off-board scores (28 of 450). I think the only extrapolation I can draw from this is more than twice as many people by percentage off-board have scores higher than 76 and listed as least one of the three cities: Miami, Irvine, and Cleveland. I would not like to think (and I don’t) that only 10 percent of off-board higher scorers above were invited (as was the case with on-board higher scorers). That would mean there are 280 off-board scores of 76 or above. Combined with 41 on-board scores, that would be 321 scores above 76, skewing the medium and mean well above the 69 and change calculated by Semipa. I prefer to think a higher percentage of off-board higher scorers listed availability for Miami, Irvine, or Cleveland.
|
|
|
Post by amporci on Nov 27, 2007 21:38:01 GMT -5
I am no mathematician, so I have taken the much simpler road of noting that what is said to be a register of only 36 (granted with quite limited geographic availability) managed to get to at least one score of less than 76...gives those of us in the lower 70s hope!
|
|