|
|
Post by judicature on Feb 2, 2008 21:08:27 GMT -5
Second Poll.
|
|
|
|
Post by ellie on Feb 4, 2008 16:38:18 GMT -5
In light of the number of federal employees, it would make sense for SSA to consider location in making the offers. They could avoid paying relocation expenses (if any are to be paid) by offering the federal employees placements near their current residences. I have no idea if they would ever do this or if it is allowed, however.
|
|
|
|
Post by govtattorney on Feb 4, 2008 17:28:26 GMT -5
most federal employees are located in dc and dc, va, and md. are not on the cert.
|
|
|
|
Post by Propmaster on Feb 4, 2008 18:37:42 GMT -5
Just to explain my "other" vote, I work at a legal aid organization, which didn't really fit any of the other categories.
|
|
|
|
Post by snowman on Feb 4, 2008 18:44:32 GMT -5
I voted "other" too. I am a private atty. But, the category was "private/corporate". I am not corporate.
|
|
biker
Full Member
Posts: 40
|
Post by biker on Feb 4, 2008 20:41:05 GMT -5
I had to vote as "other". I am technically a state employee but I work for the DDS as a Hearings Officer.
|
|
cybear
Full Member
sic semper ursi
Posts: 57 
|
Post by cybear on Feb 4, 2008 20:52:10 GMT -5
I voted "other" too. I am a private atty. But, the category was "private/corporate". I am not corporate. Like Snowman, I am a Plaintiff's lawyer. Nonetheless, I took some Reglan and pulled the corporate/private practice lever. |
|
|
|
Post by judicature on Feb 4, 2008 23:19:49 GMT -5
My intent was to capture any private practice and any in-house corporate counsel. Alas, it is hard to be concise and precise at the same time!  |
|
cybear
Full Member
sic semper ursi
Posts: 57
|
Post by cybear on Feb 5, 2008 4:10:15 GMT -5
My intent was to capture any private practice and any in-house corporate counsel. Alas, it is hard to be concise and precise at the same time! Don't worry about it. Lawyers on this side of the fence never miss a chance to poke fun at their adversaries.  |
|
|
|
Post by crazybroad on Feb 8, 2008 10:05:07 GMT -5
So where are those people who alleged that there were more than 40-50 ODAR e'ees on the list? The poll above doesn't really show that there are more ODAR than Feds.
|
|
cybear
Full Member
sic semper ursi
Posts: 57
|
Post by cybear on Feb 9, 2008 3:31:53 GMT -5
So where are those people who alleged that there were more than 40-50 ODAR e'ees on the list? The poll above doesn't really show that there are more ODAR than Feds. There has been more than a little conjecture about the numbers of persons on this cert with ODAR/ORC experience. Please recall that only about 166 scores were ever posted from the roughly 625 scores of those who performed the WD and received an SI. While we may have obtained a valid statistical sample for assessing those scores, would it not be difficult to assume, from the data posted in this thread, any true number of ODAR /ORC applicants who made this cert? |
|
|
|
Post by happy on Feb 9, 2008 11:29:05 GMT -5
So where are those people who alleged that there were more than 40-50 ODAR e'ees on the list? The poll above doesn't really show that there are more ODAR than Feds. Hmmm. Well, I know of 13 FedROs who were on the list and 7 HO/RO people. Given my limited acquaintance ODAR-wide, I would say 20 people just within my knowledge tends to suggest more than 50 ODARees in toto. I think Cybear's right. People either don't know about this board or don't care to post. |
|
|
|
Post by morgullord on Feb 9, 2008 15:15:14 GMT -5
Chalk it up to people not wanting to post; I know of three others who not only are on the certificate but refuse to talk about it, perhaps out of superstition.
|
|
