|
|
Post by carrickfergus on Aug 23, 2022 15:52:16 GMT -5
Very interesting CAFC decision. Bottom line - I think - is it affirmed the patent board's denial of a patent request for artificial intelligence to determine eligibility for Social Security disability benefits. Which of course disincentivizes the AI process from going forward, at least from the private sector. I don't know how to link the decision but it's an easy Google.
Edit to add that my IP chops ended after law school, but if you are on this board and also are an IP maven, this is def your thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Aug 23, 2022 16:35:19 GMT -5
Very interesting CAFC decision. Bottom line - I think - is it affirmed the patent board's denial of a patent request for artificial intelligence to determine eligibility for Social Security disability benefits. Which of course disincentivizes the AI process from going forward, at least from the private sector. I don't know how to link the decision but it's an easy Google. Edit to add that my IP chops ended after law school, but if you are on this board and also are an IP maven, this is def your thing. Simple: cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2113.OPINION.8-23-2022_1994643.pdfBut then I guess that is why I am Pixie and you are Carrickfergus? |
|
|
|
Post by carrickfergus on Aug 23, 2022 20:53:37 GMT -5
I guess I'm CF and not Pixie because I made an interesting post and not a snide remark.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Aug 24, 2022 5:37:17 GMT -5
I guess I'm CF and not Pixie because I made an interesting post and not a snide remark. The remark was made in fun, not intended to be snide. Pixie |
|
|
|
Post by carrickfergus on Aug 24, 2022 14:21:26 GMT -5
Mea Culpa, was one of those days....
|
|
