|
|
Post by aljsouth on May 12, 2009 8:38:39 GMT -5
I know of two transfer offers made late last week. Until the agency has gotten this completed it cannot know what openings it will have.
Both of the offes involved a site that was on the list of sites sent to candidates.
I do not know why this was left to such a late date.
|
|
|
|
Post by benchsitter on May 12, 2009 9:23:22 GMT -5
Which sites were involved (if you can share)?
|
|
|
|
Post by aljsouth on May 13, 2009 16:30:10 GMT -5
Which sites were involved (if you can share)? Both in the South. 1 in region 4 and another in Region 6. I don't feel at liberty to reveal any more information on a public board. Both should open up a spot for candidates either this round or in the September hires (subject to transfer list obligations). |
|
|
|
Post by ssaer on May 13, 2009 18:24:15 GMT -5
Which sites were involved (if you can share)? Both in the South. 1 in region 4 and another in Region 6. I don't feel at liberty to reveal any more information on a public board. Both should open up a spot for candidates either this round or in the September hires (subject to transfer list obligations). What do we know about "the September hires"? Does this group include a portion of the 157 ALJs who are the subject of the recent hiring initiative, or does this refer to an additional hiring initiative? Has a September date for additional hiring been confirmed? Do we know the scope of the September hiring initiative (i.e., how many)? |
|
|
|
Post by privateatty on May 13, 2009 19:41:15 GMT -5
Both in the South. 1 in region 4 and another in Region 6. I don't feel at liberty to reveal any more information on a public board. Both should open up a spot for candidates either this round or in the September hires (subject to transfer list obligations). What do we know about "the September hires"? Does this group include a portion of the 157 ALJs who are the subject of the recent hiring initiative, or does this refer to an additional hiring initiative? Has a September date for additional hiring been confirmed? Do we know the scope of the September hiring initiative (i.e., how many)? Good questions and probably on a few minds. It is my memory, subject to revision that the "answers" or at least highly relevant posts, cite to the primary #, more than confirmed, of 157 in two weeks. The Sep. hire is allegedly to "backfill" declinations regarding the original 157 (which may be more than a few)--and add some "lower scorers" there--but I'm not clear if they plan to get to the 2008 # of approximately (jh knows for sure) 195. The "goal" of 200+ in 2010 is FY 2010 and could begin in Oct-Nov 2009, but it is likely somewhat later. |
|
|
|
Post by benchsitter on May 14, 2009 16:36:26 GMT -5
Thanks for the info aljsouth. At this stage any tidbit of information is helpful.
|
|
|
|
Post by okeydokey on May 14, 2009 17:15:05 GMT -5
Both in the South. 1 in region 4 and another in Region 6. I don't feel at liberty to reveal any more information on a public board. Both should open up a spot for candidates either this round or in the September hires (subject to transfer list obligations). Does "both" refer to transfer in or to transfer out? That is, are Region 4 and Region 6 gaining or losing ALJs? |
|
|
|
Post by aljsouth on May 14, 2009 20:53:33 GMT -5
Both in the South. 1 in region 4 and another in Region 6. I don't feel at liberty to reveal any more information on a public board. Both should open up a spot for candidates either this round or in the September hires (subject to transfer list obligations). Does "both" refer to transfer in or to transfer out? That is, are Region 4 and Region 6 gaining or losing ALJs? Good question. Openings will both be in Region 4. One transfer intra region 4, the other from 4 to region 6. |
|
|
|
Post by 2001alj on May 15, 2009 15:38:44 GMT -5
One transfer offer was to transfer to Atlanta downtown
|
|
