|
|
Post by bippity on Jul 13, 2020 16:40:01 GMT -5
Not a judgy job at all - think judicial law clerk. It's still good training for a DW who feels stuck and wants to become an ALJ, if and when SSA ever hires again. Alas, since it is posted as a GS-15, only feds with 52+ weeks at GS-14 or higher are eligible. That keeps the DWs out of consideration, unless they may have had a year as a HOD or similar. |
|
|
|
Post by sealaw90 on Jul 13, 2020 20:02:13 GMT -5
Not a judgy job at all - think judicial law clerk. It's still good training for a DW who feels stuck and wants to become an ALJ, if and when SSA ever hires again. Alas, since it is posted as a GS-15, only feds with 52+ weeks at GS-14 or higher are eligible. That keeps the DWs out of consideration, unless they may have had a year as a HOD or similar. Oh, I am sorry to hear that, as it really would be a good stepping stone to ALJ-land! Anyway, I highly recommend applying, it's a good job and an important mission. |
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Jul 16, 2020 10:46:31 GMT -5
|
|
gavel
Full Member
Posts: 62 
|
Post by gavel on Jul 16, 2020 11:03:32 GMT -5
Not just ALJ's only but the candidate must have held an AL-2 position for at least one year.
|
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Aug 1, 2020 15:54:30 GMT -5
Have a background in Federal Labor laws? Here's a LIMITED TO FIRST 50 GS13/14 job basically clerking for a Board Member which is kinda sorta judgy. www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/574986700This one from Pension Guarantee Corp is limited in number and still open so if you have a leaning towards personnel type litigation this could give you a shot: www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/574489500 (I didn't include it earlier as it seemed closed for a while) it's a 14 Good luck! |
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Aug 14, 2020 15:16:23 GMT -5
|
|
wendy
Full Member
Posts: 50 
|
Post by wendy on Aug 15, 2020 6:39:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by bippity on Aug 17, 2020 17:11:20 GMT -5
Are you someone who believes in using all that highly detailed data the agency has been collecting on employees to identify "performance gaps" and optimize human capital for greater efficiency? Or a political appointee who wants to burrow? Either way, this SES job might be for you. www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/575671200The position includes advising and consulting on new strategic directions related to agency performance and identifying opportunities for innovative change that will improve upon these efforts and significantly advance the successful achievement of agency performance measures. The incumbent improves the agency's performance by navigating through cross-component shared priorities by conducting data driven reviews of component performance and spurring innovative customer experience solutions for solving performance gaps across the agency. In addition, the incumbent: Through a broad and thorough review, assesses agency-wide performance initiatives and cross agency priority goals to coordinate achievement of such goals. Develops collaborative component-wide networks to advance initiatives across the agency in order to provide recommendations to the Commissioner, Deputy Commissioner, and other senior staff for revisions or changes in strategic direction. Evaluates current performance management practices throughout the agency and renders formal advice to agency leadership to reduce agency risks, improve data transparency, and improve customer service. Sets priorities and monitors progress of agency goals based on the identification of emerging data and improvement issues. Leverages expertise in performance management practices to improve customer experience and service delivery through the implementation and development of new programs and policies resulting from cross-component data assessments. |
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Aug 18, 2020 15:41:37 GMT -5
You said a mouthful!
"..... navigating through cross-component shared priorities by conducting data driven reviews of component performance and spurring innovative customer experience solutions for solving performance gaps across the agency. "
D-mn! That is some verbiage!
|
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Aug 18, 2020 16:08:09 GMT -5
I saw an announcement--looked interesting geographically, Announcement date 8/17, close date 8/21. A little short, but ...who knows? (Or maybe they had a fave and we were just window dressing for the anointed applicant. Today I went to apply it said closed--on 8/17.
In my lengthy experience of job applications this is a first. Any thoughts?
|
|
|
|
Post by carrickfergus on Aug 18, 2020 18:31:19 GMT -5
Whoever wrote that job announcement is a very high-ranking energy vampire.
|
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Nov 12, 2020 23:12:05 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Jan 15, 2021 16:26:22 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury on Jan 15, 2021 16:58:47 GMT -5
Not to rain on your parade, but that is a 0905 attorney senior executive position. And yes, it will probably go to an internal candidate. |
|
|
|
Post by aljhopefully on Jan 15, 2021 17:27:37 GMT -5
Not to rain on your parade, but that is a 0905 attorney senior executive position. And yes, it will probably go to an internal candidate. Will definitely go to a VLJ. |
|
|
|
Post by neufenland on Jan 16, 2021 10:09:22 GMT -5
Not to rain on your parade, but that is a 0905 attorney senior executive position. And yes, it will probably go to an internal candidate. 100% |
|
|
|
Post by intothewild on Jan 16, 2021 20:59:42 GMT -5
Not to rain on your parade, but that is a 0905 attorney senior executive position. And yes, it will probably go to an internal candidate. Yup BVA never hirers outsiders for the VLJ gig. |
|
|
|
Post by jagvet on Jan 16, 2021 22:03:16 GMT -5
Some day we'll get an honest announcement, maybe like this:
"[Agency] is only posting this announcement to cover for hiring/promoting an unqualified person for the position who is an insider/relative-of-the-hiring-official-(but different surname)/political/incompetent-litigant-who-has-to-be-given-a-job/living-with-the-hiring-official-and-threatening-to-break-up. We expect every applicant to file reams of resumes, supporting documents, references and recommendations, writing samples, but will hire the preselected person who will submit nothing but a name and address. The person hired is expected to have 30 years of experience in a related field, but six months in our agency with a proven knack for planning the annual Christmas party will suffice. We will hire the preselected applicant in a week, but will keep you hanging for eight months."
|
|
|
|
Post by sealaw90 on Jan 17, 2021 15:36:47 GMT -5
That us so true JAGVet!
|
|
|
|
Post by foghorn on Jan 17, 2021 18:35:03 GMT -5
Jagvet rocks the board!
|
|
