|
Post by Ace Midnight on Apr 15, 2015 13:38:41 GMT -5
I'm sure the poor quality was confined to those above you on the list CT. Like Ace. I understand - I get the picture.
|
|
|
Post by luckylady2 on Apr 15, 2015 14:59:46 GMT -5
Hey Ace - haven't heard from you in a while!
|
|
|
Post by 71stretch on Apr 15, 2015 18:38:46 GMT -5
Well, I pared down my GAL again. When I have time, I'll have to go through and see what's left. It wasn't completely wide open to start with, but close enough that it will tell me what cities haven't shown up yet from this register.
|
|
|
Post by cheesy on Apr 16, 2015 8:10:31 GMT -5
[/quote]They wouldn't have this problem in Middlesboro if they hadn't let one slacker judge transfer to Tupelo. [/quote]
Transferring to Tupelo... Sounds like a bluegrass song about a prisoner relocation, a la "Oh Brother..." Immediately following the classic "Missing in Middlesboro"...
Good to see that Ace and MPD are still in the traffic pattern! Was worried about the lack of comms there...
|
|
|
Post by Gaidin on Apr 16, 2015 9:37:52 GMT -5
Alison Krauss sings "Transferring to Tupelo" Ok. Not really but I'd buy it on Itunes.
|
|
|
Post by dpageks on Apr 16, 2015 10:16:15 GMT -5
BTW, awesome! My current supervisor thinks I will be an OUTSTANDING SSA ALJ! Your current supervisor is biased.... ;-) DISCLAIMER: I am just teasing based on my belief that Miss is a sole practitioner. I concur with Miss' current supervisor. Who do they call if an ALJ candidate doesn't have a supervisor? How about an ALJ candidate that is currently holding an elected position and is supervised by no one, save the voters?
|
|
|
Post by dpageks on Apr 16, 2015 10:19:55 GMT -5
Did anyone else notice that their NOR was listed at the top of the GAL form? What would be the purpose of this?
|
|
|
Post by gary on Apr 16, 2015 10:33:31 GMT -5
Did anyone else notice that their NOR was listed at the top of the GAL form? What would be the purpose of this? I had noticed it but not considered what it might mean. Does it also show your veteran's preference on the same page?
|
|
|
Post by Missundaztood on Apr 16, 2015 10:38:02 GMT -5
Your current supervisor is biased.... ;-) DISCLAIMER: I am just teasing based on my belief that Miss is a sole practitioner. I concur with Miss' current supervisor. Who do they call if an ALJ candidate doesn't have a supervisor? How about an ALJ candidate that is currently holding an elected position and is supervised by no one, save the voters? I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference?
|
|
|
Post by dpageks on Apr 16, 2015 10:40:57 GMT -5
Did anyone else notice that their NOR was listed at the top of the GAL form? What would be the purpose of this? I had noticed it but not considered what it might mean. Does it also show your veteran's preference on the same page? It doesn't list anything regarding a Vet preference on the GAL form. The OF-306 shows my service but I don't see anything regarding my Vet preference listed on any of this paperwork.
|
|
|
Post by Gaidin on Apr 16, 2015 10:41:48 GMT -5
Did anyone else notice that their NOR was listed at the top of the GAL form? What would be the purpose of this? I had noticed it but not considered what it might mean. Does it also show your veteran's preference on the same page? My guess is that its just there if there are two John Smith's on a cert they can quickly sort which is which.
|
|
|
Post by gary on Apr 16, 2015 10:42:03 GMT -5
Who do they call if an ALJ candidate doesn't have a supervisor? How about an ALJ candidate that is currently holding an elected position and is supervised by no one, save the voters? I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Perhaps where the form asks for your supervisor, you should hand write, "None of your business!!!!!!!"
|
|
|
Post by gary on Apr 16, 2015 10:44:30 GMT -5
I had noticed it but not considered what it might mean. Does it also show your veteran's preference on the same page? My guess is that its just there if there are two John Smith's on a cert they can quickly sort which is which. That makes sense. I was toying with the idea that maybe they wanted all the information relevant to selection of a candidate on a single piece of paper, but without veteran's preference info that doesn't work.
|
|
|
Post by dpageks on Apr 16, 2015 10:44:37 GMT -5
Who do they call if an ALJ candidate doesn't have a supervisor? How about an ALJ candidate that is currently holding an elected position and is supervised by no one, save the voters? I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Well, I was re-elected in 2012, so this should be evidence that my supervisor (the voters) approved of my performance.
|
|
|
Post by Gaidin on Apr 16, 2015 10:44:48 GMT -5
I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Perhaps where the form asks for your supervisor, you should hand write, "None of your business!!!!!!!" I advise anyone with whom I share cert cities to consider answering multiple questions in this manner. I mean seriously, what do they want to know all that for. I say give them what for.
|
|
|
Post by Missundaztood on Apr 16, 2015 10:47:07 GMT -5
I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Well, I was re-elected in 2012, so this should be evidence that my supervisor (the voters) approved of my performance. IMHO, I think that might be giving the government contractor who performs the background check too much credit to figure that out...just sayin'
|
|
|
Post by gary on Apr 16, 2015 11:03:16 GMT -5
I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Well, I was re-elected in 2012, so this should be evidence that my supervisor (the voters) approved of my performance. That is a wonderful accomplishment of which you can be justly proud. I am not sure the contractors who do the reference checks would know how to properly value it in their report back to SSA.
|
|
|
Post by hondo35 on Apr 16, 2015 11:06:07 GMT -5
I have given as additional references co-counsel who I have worked on cases with and who have also hired me to do work on their own cases. I figure that way it makes it easy for them. So maybe just give an additional professional reference? Perhaps where the form asks for your supervisor, you should hand write, "None of your business!!!!!!!" That's how I answered most of my interview questions...hmmm. Wonder why I haven't gotten an offer yet.
|
|
|
Post by Gaidin on Apr 16, 2015 11:15:04 GMT -5
Perhaps where the form asks for your supervisor, you should hand write, "None of your business!!!!!!!" That's how I answered most of my interview questions...hmmm. Wonder why I haven't gotten an offer yet. Thanks for being a team player hondo35.
|
|
|
Post by dpageks on Apr 16, 2015 11:25:07 GMT -5
Well, I was re-elected in 2012, so this should be evidence that my supervisor (the voters) approved of my performance. That is a wonderful accomplishment of which you can be justly proud. I am not sure the contractors who do the reference checks would know how to properly value it in their report back to SSA. Although you are probably correct, I would like to think a contractor in such a business would have encountered this issue before and have appropriate, established procedures in place by which they are able to provide SSA a complete report.
|
|