|
|
Post by gary on Jul 10, 2016 7:38:03 GMT -5
2016 Timeline thus far: Application Period Open 3/29/2016 Application Period Close 4/08/2016 Invites to Online Component 6/08/2016 Online Component Open 6/20/2016 - 07/01/2016 I will happily attempt edit of the first page timeline, it is helpful. anyone with link to "how to" edit such? I think that would have to be done by maxlaw (the original poster) or Pixie or ALJD. |
|
|
|
Post by Pixie on Jul 10, 2016 10:57:48 GMT -5
I couldn't get it to go in a spreadsheet format, so I added the latest information on the rapidly improving class of 2016 at the bottom of Maxlaw's timelines. Pixie
|
|
|
|
Post by sophie22 on Aug 15, 2016 20:30:22 GMT -5
2016 Applicants
Approx. 5500 applicants
Approx. 2100 made it to DC Testing
Board polls indicate that 1050-1200 made it on to the Register
Application Period Open 3/29/2016
Application Period Close 4/08/2016
Invites to Online Component 6/08/2016
Online Component Open 6/20/2016 - 07/01/2016
Invites to DC Testing 8/12/16
Self Scheduling Opens for DC Testing 8/15/16
DC Testing 9/12/16 - 3/24/17 (Make up testing for snow day 5/8-5/9)
Status changes to Complete or See Details - 5/25/17
NORs Released - 6/13/17
1st Cert - 7/11/17, Interviews 7/31-8/16 (10/16/17 start date)
|
|
|
|
Post by SPN Lifer on Feb 2, 2018 1:16:12 GMT -5
As far as the specific data point you're looking at (notification to do in-person testing in DC to receipt of NOR), the 2013 applicants' dates are correct. There is other information (cert dates, etc) which as you can see was not filled in here. And keep in mind there was another batch of people who applied in 2013 but did in-person testing in 2015, and the lag between notification for in-person testing and receipt of NOR was not noted on this chart for that group. Too bad the 2015 DC-tester information appears lost to the ages, without extensive thread research. See also m.aljdiscussion.proboards.com/thread/4385/unofficial-2016-application-timeline-thread (containing list of eight certs from May 2014 to February 2017 -- my first); m.aljdiscussion.proboards.com/thread/4526/unofficial-2017-application-timeline-thread. It is good we are keeping this data up-to-date now. |
|
|
|
Post by johnthornton on May 6, 2022 10:19:57 GMT -5
And last month, the Social Security Administration posted a job announcement on USAJOBS.gov seeking 1,000 applicants to become new administrative law judges within the Office of Hearing Operations. But, contrary to OPM guidance issued last fall, the posting did not mention whether the jobs were eligible for union membership or that the positions would be represented by the Association of Administrative Law Judges. Hinkle declined to answer questions about why the agency failed to mention the positions’ bargaining unit status. www.govexec.com/workforce/2022/05/senators-labor-aljs-social-security-administration-union/366582/ |
|
float
Full Member
Posts: 82
|
Post by float on Aug 26, 2022 7:42:38 GMT -5
Two possible reasons for that failure to comment: first, as I recall there are efforts afoot in Congress to eliminate the distinction. Waving goodbye to Ms Gruber will allow that to advance. The other is that there is a new ALJ contract pending. I don't recall whether this excepted service/not excepted service distinction is addressed in the new contract, but the specter of ratification looms over any SSA official asked for comments about anything related to judges, for now.
|
|
